IJC_H2_ECONS_Essay_Q3_SuggestedSolutions

3 As more countries are facing economic difficulties and an ageing population, some governments have sought to increas e competition within the healthcare sector to reduce its cost while others are reducing s ubsidies to prevent their healthcare spending from escalating. Discuss the economic case for the different approaches mentioned above. [25] Suggested outline i) Explain up to 3 sources of market failure in healthcare market  positive externality in consumption with diagram  imperfect information  the market dominance, equit y or factor immobility *clear explanation on how each causes lead to market failure *government failure in resolving efficiency caused by fiscal deficit and debt is acceptable ii) Objectives of government intervention iii) Body 1: Case for increase in competition  rising healthcare cost attributable to inefficiencies in the SS of healthcare. Inefficiencies could arise from market dominance by private firm s e.g. likely operate under oligopoly  possibility of collusion among healthcare providers exploitations  welfare loss  inefficient allocation of resources or cause by red-tape in government-run healthcare providers. These made a competitive market an effective solution.  rising healthcare cost due to DD factors but is significant enough to have secondary impact on + increasing fiscal deficit  need to cut spending  further contractionary impact on economy worsen economic growth and employment + reduce tax revenue  vicious cycle + inaccessibility of healthcare by lower income group Although caused by demand factors, it is a long term DD problem. Hence, a more competitive supply could help curb the problem of rising healthcare cost.  Trend of ageing population  continue to strain the fiscal balance of countries  government spending need to be managed or face the consequence of large debt. Hence, between the two policies, subsidies need to be reduced or controlled. However, might lead to other serious issue of lack of access to healthcare of lower income group or a less productivity workforce. iv) Body 2: Case for reducing subsidies  effectiveness of subsidy over policies to promote of a more competitive market especially where there exist significant conflicts with equity  if fiscal deficit due to excessive spending in other social aims e.g. over ly generous unemployment benefits  should tackle root cause and not reduce subsidy on healthcare  harmful effect of excessive competition (argument from Monopolistic Competition)  high MES  likely operate under oligopoly  possibility of collusion among healthcare providers  high exploitation or higher unit cost if operate on a smaller scale.  increasing competition under situation of im perfect knowledge by consumers might lead to exploitation by healthcare providers to maintain profits v) Possible Evaluation - Considers differing fiscal