2023 SGSS SS PRELIM ANS KEY

4E5N Prelim Section A Suggested Answer (St Gabriels) 1 Study Source A. Why was this infographic published? Explain your answer using details from the source. [6] Suggested Answer Take note: Good answers should link to context of minimal recycling rates mentioned in BI. Success Criteria The infographic was published because the government wants to convince (P) Singaporeans (A) that recycling efforts are not desirable (M) so that they might feel guilty (F) and decide to put in effort to lower waste generation in and out of home (A). This is because despite the minimal improvements in recycling rates, Singapore still generated slight more waste in 2022 than in 2021. (S) This is seen from the poster which shows that there is an increase in waste generated over a period of 3 years for both domestic and non- domestic waste, implying that Singaporeans need to put in more effort. ● Because ● Powerful verb ● Audience ● Message ● Feelings ● Action ● Situation ● Evi + Exp 2 Study Sources B and C. How far does the speaker in Source B agree with the Minister in Source C? Explain your answer. [7] Suggested Answer Note: - Answers using similar / different → 0 - When disagreeing / refuting, always use opposite meaning words Success Criteria The speaker in B would agree (A) with the Minister in C on Singaporeans ’ irresponsible recycling behaviour (CC).Source B asserts that "people do not bother to check what can be recycled and what cannot." (Evi) This highlights the issue of people's indifference towards understanding the guidelines for proper recycling and suggests a lack of awareness or motivation to engage in responsible recycling practices, contributing to the problem. (Exp) Similarly (CW) In Source C, the Minister notes that "those who try to recycle do it wrongly by throwing the e-waste into the general recycling bins." (Evi) Source C's statement underscores the problem of individuals who make an effort to recycle but may not be adequately informed about how to recycle responsibly, worsening the challenge of effective recycling in Singapore. (Exp) ● ATQ ● Common Criteria ● Comparison word ● Evidence x2 1 best line ● Explanation x2 The speaker in Source B would disagree (A) with the Minister in Source C in terms of the reasons behind ineffective recycling efforts in Singapore. Source B suggests that ineffective recycling takes place because of a lack of concern for the environment but Source C suggests that ineffective recycling takes place because of a lack of knowledge. (CC) Source B argues that, “the issue is that people do not bother to check ● ATQ ● Common Criteria ● Comparison word ● Evidence x2

2023 PHSS 4E5N SOCIAL STUDIES PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MARK SCHEME what can be recycled and what cannot." (Evi) Source B implies that individuals have an indifferent attitude towards recycling and will choose the easy way out, thus, recycling efforts are ineffective (Exp). In contrast (CW), Source C says, "most people do want to recycle but are let down by their own laziness." (Evi) Source C suggests that ineffective recycling takes place because of individuals' inertia or reluctance to take the necessary actions, resulting in ineffective recycling. (Exp) 1 best line ● Explanation x2 Using the position and context of creators of the sources. (L5/7) The speaker in B would agree with the Minister in C because they would both aim to increase recycling efforts in Singapore (ATQ + LOR). Source B was an interview with Ms Robin Rheaume, who advocates for the environment and educates Singaporeans on reducing waste and to recycle (WHO). In the source, she emphasises that Singaporeans ’ lack of concern for the environment renders campaigns and recycling bins ineffective in a bid to cause guilt amongst Singaporeans and to rally them to start putting in effort to sort their trash for effective recy cling (WHAT + WHY). With a similar aim in mind (CW), the Minister in C who would want to ensure that Singapore ’s environmental policies are sustainable for our development while meeting peoples ’ needs (WHO) addresses Singaporeans and emphasises the problem that ineffective recycling causes, hoping to get Singaporeans t o learn more about recycling and carry out effective recycling with their electronic waste (WHAT + WHY) . Given the context of the sources, where recycling rate has increased minimally over the past few years, it is thus natural that both the speaker and the minister would agree on getting Singaporeans to start developing effective recycling habits to ensure that waste generation is kept to a low. (Expf of WHY they would be similar) ● ATQ ● PAMFASEE of C ● Explanation of why Minister will not agree with Author of B, taking into consideration: -What is said - Where is said -Who is he addressing 3 Study Source D. Is the source reliable as evidence about recycling efforts in Singapore? Explain your answer. [6] Suggested Answer Success Criteria Source D is reliable as evidence that recycling efforts in Singapore are ineffective (ATQ) because Source C it (LOR). Both (CW) sources suggest that recycling efforts in Singapore are ineffective (CC). Source D states that, "throwing all the waste down the chute in the comfort of their own homes is much easier than separating the recyclables from general waste and then going through the hassle of heading downstairs to the blue recycling bins." (Evi) This shows that many prefer the easier option of disposing of all waste together rather than making the effort to separate ● ATQ + LOR ● Common Criteria ● Comparison word ● Evidence x2 1 best line

2023 PHSS 4E5N SOCIAL STUDIES PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MARK SCHEME recyclables, leading to poor recycling efforts (Exp). Similarly (CW), Source C says “those who attempt to recycle, 34.1 percent do it wrongly, by throwing the e-waste into the general recycling bins ”. (Evi) This suggests that people's improper recycling behaviours are driven by a lack of awareness or effort, and thus, keep recycling efforts ineffective in Singapore (Exp). ● Explanation x2 Source D is not reliable as evidence that recycling efforts in Singapore are ineffective (ATQ) because Source F refutes it (LOR). Source D suggests that recycling efforts in Singapore are ineffective but Source F suggests that recycling efforts in Singapore have been effective (CC). Source D states that, "throwing all the waste down the chute in the comfort of their own homes is much easier than separating the recyclables from general waste and then going through the hassle of heading downstairs to the blue recycling bins." (Evi) This shows that many prefer the easier option of disposing of all waste together rather than making the effort to separate recyclables, leading to poor recycling efforts (Exp). However (CW), Source F states “To date, more than 10,000 kg of used shoes have been recycled for use in building infrastructure ” which suggests that recycling efforts have been put to good use and are effective (Exp). ● ATQ + LOR ● Common Criteria ● Comparison word ● Evidence 1 best line ● Explanation 4. Study Source E. Are you surprised by what Source E says? Explain your answer. [6] Suggested Answer Note: - Para 1: Xref of E - Para 2: Highest level - 4Ws + 3Vs Success Criteria XREF of E I am not surprised by E which said that recycling efforts are ineffective (ATQ + LOR) , as it is expected as it is supported by Source B (LOR). In Source E, the photograph and extract depicts racks of shoes that are still in good condition being thrown for recycling, but instead had gone to be sold as second hair items. (EVI) This suggests that recycling efforts were not successful as these items are available for purchase by consumers again, and potentially could