bartley 3E ss eoy paper 2023 (lorms)

1 SUGGESTED LORMS FOR 3EXPRESS EOY 2023 SECTION A (Source-Based Case Study) 1 Study Source A. What is the message in this source? Explain your answer. [5] Level Descriptors Marks L1 Describes / lifts from source / misinterpretation Award 1m for misinterpretation and lifting from source. Award 2m for description of source details on increase in animal abuse cases in Singapore. e.g. The poster shows a dog and a text that states how animal abuse is very dangerous. Misinterpretation : Nothing has been done against animal abuse offenders . 1-2 marks L2 Sub-Message Supported Award 3m for sub-message supported Sub-message ( answers that do not focus on impact of animal abuse on society) e.g. Animal abuse is a serious social crime that can impact the society in the long run severely. 2-3 marks L3 (Main Message) Valid inference, supported Award 5m for message supported.. Answer must highlight that animal abuse cannot be lifted due to complexity / and its impact on society is very detrimental e.g. Animal abuse is a serious social crime that can impact the society in the long run severely Evidence : “ Abuse of animals are as 5 times as likely to cause harm to humans “ implying the potential threats to humans if this crime is not dealt with severely. 4-5 marks

2 2) Study Source B. Do you think the speaker is supportive of the government’s handling of animal abuse offences in Singapore? Explain your answer. [6] Target Skill: Infer Partiality Level Descriptor Marks L1 Describes source details./ No Stand is provided. E.g. The source talks about the current impact of legal actions taken on animal abusers .(1m) No stand is provided but reason is partial .( 2m) E.g. I can infer that the current impact of legal actions taken on animal abusers need attention. 1-2 L2 Stand Unsupported. Award L2/3 if Stand is supported but without reason. Award L2/3 if partial reason is supported and explained . Award L2/4 if Stand is supported by valid reason. (Partial view) only e.g. I do not think she is supportive as she does not praise the approach. Evidence: “ punishment for animal abusers is too lenient”. OR Valid Inference : e.g. I think she does not support as she views that the government is not being efficient in ensuring the prevention of animal abuse/not effective against animal abuse. Evidence : ““ punishment for animal abusers is too lenient”. Note: Award L2/2 for inferences made without a stand only if they are fully supported and explained. Otherwise award L1/1. 3-4 L3 Valid Stand Supported Award 6m to a well-explained answer. e.g. I think she does not support as she views that the government is not being efficient in ensuring the prevention of animal abuse/not effective against animal abuse. Evidence : “ punishment is too lenient … we pr