2025 NYJC Prelim P2 INSERT

NANYANG JUNIOR COLLEGE Year 2 Preliminary Examination H2 GEOGRAPHY 9173/02 Paper 2 23 Sept 2025 INSERT 3 hours READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST This Insert contains all the Resources referred to in the questions. This document consists of 8 printed pages. [Turn over

2 Higher 2 Geography / 9173 Resource 1 for Question 1 Area around the Klang River where the students conducted their investigation Site 1 Site 3

3 Higher 2 Geography / 9173 Resource 2A for Question 1 Jalan Tepi Sungei – Land use zoning next to the Klang River (Site 1) Resource 2B for Question 1 Jalan Tengku Kelana - Banks of the Klang River with green spaces and a walkway featuring retaining walls (Site 2) Resource 2C for Question 1 Kampung Datuk Dagang – one of the lanes within that residential estate lined with landed houses (Site 3)

4 Higher 2 Geography / 9173 Resource 3 for Question 1 Questionnaire used by the students to gather perceptions of flood risk at all three sites Site surveyed: ☐ Jalan Tepi Sungei ☐ Jalan Tengku Kelana ☐ Kampung Datuk Dagang 1. How serious do you think flood risk is in your area? ☐ Low ☐ Moderate ☐ High 2. In the past 5 years, have you or your household experienced flooding in this area? ☐ Yes ☐ No 3. If yes, what impacts did the flooding have on your household? (Choose all that apply) ☐ Property damage ☐ Loss of income/work disruption ☐ Health/safety concerns ☐ Temporary displacement ☐ Other: _____________ 4. What flood mitigation measures are you aware of in your area? (Choose all that apply) ☐ River embankments / levees ☐ Flood retention ponds / detention basins ☐ Drainage system upgrades ☐ Community flood warning system ☐ None ☐ Others: _____________ 5. How effective do you think these flood protection measures are? ☐ Very effective ☐ Somewhat effective ☐ Not effective ☐ Don’t know 6. In your opinion, what additional measures should be taken to reduce flood risk in this area? I think ____________________________________________________________ Thank you for your time!

5 Resource 4 for Question 1 Table summarising the survey results collected from across the three sites Site Q1: Q2: Q3: Q4: Q5: Q6: Site 1 – Jalan Tepi Sungei • 5 Moderate • 3 High • 2 Y • 6 N • 2 Property damage • 1 Loss of income • 6 Embankments • 4 Drainage upgrades • 2 Warning system • 3 Very effective • 5 Somewhat effective More zoning enforcement, wider drains, stricter building control Site 2 – Jalan Tengku Kelana • 3 Low • 3 Moderate • 2 High • 3 Y • 5 N • 2 Property damage • 1 Safety concerns • 6 Retaining walls • 5 Green buffer • 3 Drainage upgrades • • 4 Very effective • 3 Somewhat effective • 1 Not effective Extend green buffers, maintain walls, improve early warning systems Site 3 – Kampu ng Datuk Dagang • 1 Moderate • 7 High • 8 Y • 7 Property damage • 6 Loss of income • 4 Health/safety • 5 Displacement • 2 Drainage upgrades • 1 Warning system • 5 None • 6 Not effective • 2 Don’t know Build levees, install pumps, government relocation support, better drainage

6 Resource 5 for Question 2 Spatial distribution of Singapore’s aged population (above 65) in 2010 and 2018 https://wiki.smu.edu.sg/1920t1smt201/SMT201_AY2019-20T1_EX1_Kok_Su_Yee

7 Resource 6 for Question 2 Infographic on ageing in Seoul and Singapore https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/50/0bffe052-0794-475a-a23f-22d2b6ba41f3/book-age-friendly-cities.pdf

8 Resource 7 for Question 2 Photograph showing the facilities in Shinnae Medical Housing in Seoul. https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/50/0bffe052-0794-475a-a23f-22d2b6ba41f3/book-age-friendly- cities.pdf End of Paper