Hist SBQ and SEQ Formats

History   *I have shifted Assertion questions to the appendix - my school is IP so we covered it. As far as I know   it’s covered in JC but I don’t think it’s tested for Os.*     SBQ     1. Basic Inference SEE format ● Statement, evidence, elaboration ● Consider everything then make a stand, do not jump to conclusions ● L4 for CK ● “Never take cartoons too seriously” - there may be more than meets the eye ● Don’t fixate on a few words/details, understand the full meaning ● Source A tells me that (inference in own words). This can be seen from Source A that (evidence). This suggests that (evidence). 2. Inference-Purpose Question Types ● “Why did the author say this?” / “What is the purpose of this source?” / “Why was this published?” / ”What was the intention of…” Elements ● Message + evidence ● Active Verb ● Target Audience ● Desired Impact (link to message) ○ Identify the tone (bias, exaggeration of emotion) and aims of the source ● CK (link to target and provenance) ● The message of the source is to (inference: mention active verb, TA and DI). From Source X, it states that (evidence). This suggests that (explanation: link to DI + evidence). This is supported by (CK). Therefore, (explanation: link back to DI). 3. Comparison Question Types ● How different/similar… describe ​ BOTH ​ ​ similarities and differences ○ Focus on what the question asks for first then talk about other side ● How are source X and Y similar/different? Describe ​ ONE ​ ​ only (ie the one asked in the qn) ● In terms of tone, content, purpose Created by H (2018). Please do not share without my permission.

Elements ● Basis of Comparison (state in own words) ○ Needs to show some form of stance ● [CONTENT] Establish BOC -> explain sources in own words -> comparison -> evidence ● [TONE] Establish BOC -> describe tone (emotions displayed) -> explain sources in own words -> evidence -> comparison ● [PURPOSE] Establish BOC -> explain sources in own words ​ in inference purpose format (that means TA, DI etc) -> comparison -> evidence ● C: can be similar and different ● T: usually only similar *(not confirmed) ● P: usually similar or diff 4. Utility Question Types ● “How useful is this source?” / “Can Source Y help you to understand….?” / “Is the source of any use….?” ​ no it is useless and deserves to die~ Elements ● Useful or not + why ● What the source is about ● Cross refer / CK to support usefulness ● Limitations: what ● Cross refer / CK to show limitations ● Check purpose for hidden motive ● Provenance and how it could affect the perspective on the issue ● Feels like there’s more to this but okurr ● Source X is useful as it shows (...). It states that (evidence). This is supported by Source Y which states that (...). However, Source X has its limitations in the portrayal of (...). Although Source X shows (...) , it did not show (