2025 NYJC Prelim P2

NANYANG JUNIOR COLLEGE Year 2 Preliminary Examination H2 GEOGRAPHY 9173/02 Paper 2 23 Sept 2025 3 hours Additional Materials: Insert READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST If you have been given an Answer Booklet, follow the instructions on the front cover of the Booklet. Write your Centre number, index number and name on the work you hand in. Write in dark blue or black pen on both sides of the paper. You may use an HB pencil for any diagrams or graphs. Do not use staples, paper clips, glue or correction fluid. DO NOT WRITE ON ANY BARCODES. Answer Question 1 in Section A. Answer Question 2 in Section B. Answer one question in Section C. At the end of the examination, fasten all your work securely together. The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question. This document consists of 4 printed pages. [Turn over

2 Higher 2 Geography / 9173 Answer Questions 1 and 2 and EITHER Question 3 OR Question 4 Section A Cluster 4 Fieldwork 1 A group of 10 geography students from a junior college in Singapore undertook an investigation on flood risk in the Klang district of Selangor, Malaysia, during the June holidays. The students focused on three flood- prone areas: Jalan Tepi Sungei (Site 1) , Jalan Tengku Kelana (Site 2) and Kampung Datuk Dagang (Site 3). All 3 sites are located next to the Klang River. They came up with this hypothesis: Kampung Datuk Degang faces the highest flood risk due to its lack of mitigation infrastructure and strategies. Due to safety concerns, the students could not enter the river for measurements and focus instead on perceptions of flood risk and evidence of flood mitigation infrastructure. At each site, they collected data from 8 residents or business owners through a questionnaire survey. They also recorded visible flood defenses and land use features at each location through observation. Resource 1 shows the area around the Klang River where the students conducted their investigation. Resources 2A, 2B, and 2C present the three investigation sites, highlighting the flood defences in place and the observed land use. Resource 3 contains the questionnaire used by the students to gather perceptions of flood risk at all three sites. Resource 4 provides a table summarising the survey results collected from across the three sites. (a) With reference to Resource 1, explain why the students’ hypothesis is appropriate for the investigation. [3] (b) With reference to Resources 2B and 2C, explain how the students could minimi se potential risks when visiting the two sites. [6] (c) Suggest suitable sampling methods that the students could adopt for th